REFERENCE COVERAGE AUDIT - RAMLALLA BRAND KIT 16

Source actually opened: upload/Concept 3 - Ram Mandir Logo & Brand Kit.pdf, 48 pages.
Method: extracted text from all48 pages; visually inspected application pages5-10,13-16,30,32,34,36,38,40,42 and source/ceremonial/ornament pages21,23,28. Page numbering in CSV uses physical PDF pages1-48. Some original pages contain inherited printed footer numbers; those are not used.

Scope of this mapping
The CSV maps original reference requirements to the parent's planned20-scene collection and to necessary kit deliverables. It does NOT certify that pending files have been created, that final package paths exist, or that the20 scenes fully replicate the original40 scenes. GUIDE and SYSTEM identify non-mockup deliverables; PARTIAL and GAP identify coverage requiring additional work beyond the stated20 scenes. Final completion must be reconciled against the actual package manifest.

Priority coverage beyond20 mockups
1. Secondary full-length ceremonial asset and its honest QA/status; current primary portrait cannot stand in for it.
2. Visiting/business card; seal/emboss source study; welcome/keepsake card.
3. Social announcement/story templates and actual editable digital service icons.
4. Printed visitor guide/map with service/accessibility legend; use illustrative map until verified site data exist.
5. Temple-model display label/plinth; retail display/table layout; tags, cards and digital listing template.
6. Editorial souvenir/book spread and narrative storytelling layout/brief. A blank layout/brief is not a completed commissioned illustration.
7. Electric shuttle branding separately adapted from large bus. Portrait+name on transport and clothing remains required by current user direction.
8. Kurta/jacket adaptations beyond polo+waistcoat; actual embroidery stitch proof remains external production work.
9. Night/illuminated hanging signage, frosted-glass mark, foil/emboss material guidance.
10. Arrival canopy/pavilion/tent signage, book slipcase and framed-art application as editable extensions.
11. Border/rosette/arch patterns as actual editable assets, not only generated decoration.

Important distinctions
- Original PDF page44 maps an older66-page source. That older source was not inspected in this audit; its page ranges must not be confused with this48-page PDF.
- Original pages11,12,17,25 contain proposed size rules, not tested approval for the current portrait/ceremonial artwork. Preserve test intent; do not inherit minimum sizes as facts.
- Original old SVGs were described as raster containers. Current path-only vectors need their own source validation; a generated mockup does not prove exact placement or master fidelity.
- Original contains historical iconographic research and uncertainty. This audit does not independently authenticate sacred miniatures or repeat its source claims as verified facts.
- User direction takes precedence over old broad placement restrictions: portrait+name must remain on buses and clothing.
- Every scene and source remains proposed identity for review; no Trust approval, production approval or measured readability approval is implied.
- No new PDF was created. Final package owner is responsible for persistence and manifest reconciliation.

UPDATE - CURRENT PACKAGE STRATEGY
Parent is preparing20 new photographic concept mockups paired with exact SVG application layouts. This pairing can resolve the distinction between visual material mood and dependable placement: generated images remain concept previews; the SVG layouts carry the actual current15 source. A deterministic gold embossed SVG is being made directly from the same15 paths. This is an editable vector material simulation, not an editable3D mesh, manufacturing relief or automatically approved master. Final manifest inspection is still required before declaring those planned files delivered.

Root permits secondary applications to be carried as supplemental editable treatments or guidance where a separate photo mockup is unnecessary. Guidance counts as guidance; it must not be called a completed production layout. Electric shuttle, frosted-glass branding and illuminated hanging sign were separately flagged to the layout owner.

RECOVERED SECONDARY REFERENCES
A local filename search found no separately named clean ceremonial/full-length vector. Two embedded sources were located and extracted to temporary review files:
A. Original48page PDF page23, image xref30,1024x1536: tmp/pdf-reference-audit/option-a-original.png. Historical maroon full arch engraving with old single-line name and different face. The PDF contains this as an embedded raster image; page vector borders do not make the emblem vector.
B. Uploaded Shri-Ramlalla-Brand-Standards-Concept-v2.pdf,26pages, page11, image xref41,1024x1536: tmp/pdf-reference-audit/ceremonial-v2.png. Standing sculptural child with slender bow and short arrow. That page explicitly says the revision was not accepted; proportions, hand pose, attributes and face require review. Its short arrow conflicts with the user's later long-arrow request. Do not label it the latest resolved ceremonial design.
These are suitable for a historical/secondary-reference section pending alignment only. They must not become a competing primary face or be promoted to current15-based masters. Temporary extraction paths are inspection locations; package owner should archive sources with provenance if included.

SECOND-AUDIT RECONCILIATION
31editable SVG/PNG sheets now exist. coverage-reference.csv was updated with verified_package_files and delivered/partial statuses. Independent audit found56nested placements preserving exact15path sequences. New ceremonial16 study exists and was visually inspected: detailed head with schematic body; full-arch narrative is not reproduced. Keep it labelled secondary study, not a final replacement. See independent-audit.txt for concrete placement fixes and current limitations.

FINAL APPLICATION RECONCILIATION
Final application count is33SVG/PNG pairs, not31. New32-kurta-jacket and33-book-slipcase-framed-art close those earlier application-format gaps. Independent comparison of61nested placements passes;02/03/29placement corrections visually rechecked and closed. All20photo concepts were inspected and remain conceptual-only because facial/lettering redraw is observable. Remaining content/production limits are distinguished from delivered template coverage in the CSV and independent audit.
